Requiring ACH Debits is Against the Law
Nicole Munro Nicole Frush Munro
Partner
Hudson Cook, LLP
410.865.5430
nmunro@hudco.com
Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Requiring ACH Debits is Against the Law

 

At a recent conference (National Alliance of BHPH Dealers), I spoke to a number of dealers who credited taking ACH payments as their primary and very effective collection method. These dealers used technology to electronically debit buyers’ weekly, bi-weekly, semi-monthly or monthly payments from the buyers’ bank accounts through an automated clearing house (ACH). Payments are often scheduled or tied to buyers’ paydays so the dealer can ensure that there are sufficient funds in a buyer’s bank account to cover the car payment.

As electronic payment technology becomes more available in the buy here pay here industry, BHPH dealers are finding a new way to collect payments on time, with little or no direct personal involvement from the dealer’s collection or customer service departments. ACH payments save a dealer time, money and headaches.

Several dealers approached the CounselorLibrary booth at the conference happily touting the effectiveness of ACH payments, and in the same breath telling us that they required all of their buyers to sign up for automatic debits in order to finance the purchase of a car. Unfortunately, as lawyers often do, we had to burst their happy bubble.

We explained to those dealers that there is this Federal Reserve Board regulation called Regulation E. Regulation E implements a federal law called the Electronic Funds Transfer Act which, among other things, regulates electronic funds transfers from deposit accounts. Regulation E prohibits a creditor from requiring a buyer to agree to automatic debits.

Note that federal law also prohibits dealers from requiring electronic ACH debits as a condition of reinstatement. And, if state law gives the customer an unqualified right to reinstate, such a policy would also violate state law.

All is not lost, however. Although a dealer may not require buyers to agree to ACH debits, we also explained that a dealer may offer a customer an incentive to make payments by electronic debit. For example, a dealer may offer a customer a quarter- or half-percent reduction in the finance charge rate if the customer agrees to electronic payment debits. In this case, the dealer would want the deal to contain language stating that if the customer terminated the ACH during the term of the transaction, the dealer could raise the rate by that quarter- or half-percent. 

The dealer could also offer customers other types of incentives, such as free oil changes or down payment discounts, which would not cause the rate to vary.

When taking electronic debits, dealers must also keep in mind that the debits have to be authorized. Dealers may obtain debit authorizations in a number of ways, and the requirements differ depending on whether the debit is a one-time debit (a single debit entry) or a recurring debit (one scheduled to recur at specified times and in specified amounts).

In addition to Regulation E, the National Automated Clearing House Association (NACHA) Rules provide guidance on the manner in which a person can take an authorization to make a single debit or recurring debit entry. NACHA is a private, non-profit organization representing financial institutions, and it develops Operating Rules for consumer and commercial ACH transactions.

Different NACHA rules govern recurring and non-recurring single debit entries. With respect to recurring ACH debits to a consumer account, the NACHA Operating Rules provide that an authorization must be in writing, signed or similarly authenticated by the consumer. Non-recurring debit authorizations may be taken by phone, but then require the dealer to record the transaction or provide notice of the transaction to the consumer prior to the debit entry.

Because their financial institutions require it, dealers must comply with NACHA Rules.

It’s possible that some states might have laws or regulations that bear on ACH payments, so as with anything you read on these pages, you should consult your own lawyer and rely only upon his or her advice.

As buy here pay here dealers make the jump into the digital age and begin taking electronic payments, they should note the preauthorization requirements for accepting those electronic payments. And remember, no dealer may require a buyer to make payments via an electronic debit.

 

 

View all articles by Nicole Munro
View all articles in Legal & Compliance

Share this Article: Email it! | Bookmark it! | Digg it! | Reddit!
Comments
Tom Hudson, Hudson Cook
August 26, 2011 05:51 AM

Partner
Greg, If you offer the customer a reduced APR or a lower payment in exchange for the customer's voluntary agreement for ACH payments, you are not violating the federal law that prohibits requiring ACH payments.
Greg
August 25, 2011 08:54 AM

Assist Director
Hello, Can a lender make ACH a requirement after extending credit or funding a loan if it wasn't a requirement made in the original loan application or loan agreements? I work for a lender and there is some discussion about making ACH a requirement for borrowers wanting to sign up for a reduced payment plan. Thank You

Nikki Munro
July 10, 2011 11:07 PM

Attorney
Phil - You may not require the buyer to make payments via ACH and neither can the finance company. You can let a customer know that he or she can get a better rate if they make payment via ACH, but it can not be a requirement to finance. If they can not or do not want to make ACH payments, you should seek an alternative finance arrangment.
Phil Price
July 1, 2011 10:28 AM

Special Finance Manager
We have one of our Sub Prime lenders that loves these ACH payment systems. As a result we have put all of the customers that we have financed through them on an automatic payment program. Do we need tp worry that this would be seen as making this a de facto requirement?

Nicole Munro
June 30, 2011 01:39 PM

Attorney
Requiring a person to make payments via automatic electronic funds transfer is prohibited by federal law. See 15 USC § 1693k, which provides: No person may— (1) condition the extension of credit to a consumer on such consumer’s repayment by means of preauthorized electronic fund transfers; or (2) require a consumer to establish an account for receipt of electronic fund transfers with a particular financial institution as a condition of employment or receipt of a government benefit. No financial institution or other person may condition an extension of credit to a consumer on the consumer's repayment by preauthorized electronic fund transfers, except for credit extended under an overdraft credit plan or extended to maintain a specified minimum balance in the consumer's account. 12 CFR 205.10(1)(1). “Person” means a natural person or an organization, including a corporation, government agency, estate, trust, partnership, proprietorship, cooperative, or association. 12 CFR 205.2(j). ACH may be an option for payment, but may not be the only option or a condition for the extension of credit. The definition of “credit” is similar to the definition in Reg. B. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has held that Reg. B applies to a true lease governed by Reg. M. Outside the 9th Circuit the issue has not been addressed, but a Circuit Court decision can be pretty persuasive, and most credit lawyers advise their clients that it is possible that other circuits could agree with the 9th Circuit. The case is Brothers v. First Leasing, a 1984 case.
Clyde Pruett, DBA Auto City Leasing
June 29, 2011 11:00 AM

President
I read your article. We require an auto-debit for our payments. Regulation E makes reference to a financial institutions. We are a leasing company collecting lease payments. I don't see any reference to leasing. We are not selling a product to a consumer. We are providing a service by leasing vehicles. If you feel Regulation E applies to leasing vehicles, please indicate the section of the law for reference. Thank you.


Add a Comment
Name:

Title:

Comments:


Copyright 2011 Special Finanace Insider